Reading decisions
Published, unpublished, and what follows from the difference
Maine publishes some figures and stays silent on others; both states can be checked by any reader. What the courts page, the access statute, the Human Rights Commission and the Bar publish, and what is not there.

On September 6, 2026, the page describing Maine's courts on the Judicial Branch's website set out the work of every court in the State and published no rule among them for reading a case file. That silence is the subject. A fact in the public legal record is either published with a citation or absent from the page that seems to hold it, and the difference decides what can be checked and what can only be assumed.
Every court described, no rule for the papers
The Judicial Branch describes its own structure. The Supreme Judicial Court decides appeals on questions of law that arise in civil actions and criminal trials, and in that appellate capacity, as interpreter of the laws, it is called the Law Court. The Superior Court is where almost all civil and criminal matters may be tried; the District Court takes lesser criminal offenses, civil actions and family law matters. Further down the page sit the Family Division, a Violations Bureau that handles traffic tickets for the entire State, the Treatment and Recovery Courts, and the Business and Consumer Court, described as a statewide court docket for selected business and consumer cases. A reader can follow how the courts fit together in the courts folio. What the page does not publish is any rule for getting at a case record or a docket. It names the houses; it does not say where the papers live.
What does published mean when a page is silent?
Published does not mean official, and it does not mean true; it means written on a page any reader can open. The State of Maine's Freedom of Access Act page, read on September 6, 2026, states that the Act grants the people of this state a broad right of access to public records while protecting legitimate governmental interests and the privacy rights of individual citizens, and that it ensures the accountability of government by requiring public access to the meetings of public bodies. The same page does not publish the statutory citation, the definitions, the rules on who may request, or the Ombudsman's powers. A reader who takes the landing page for the whole law learns none of the numbers that do the work.
Numbers that carry their citation with them
The operative numbers sit in Title 1, section 408-A of the Maine Revised Statutes, read on the Legislature's website on September 6, 2026. An agency or official must acknowledge receipt within 5 working days, and within a reasonable time must give a good faith, nonbinding estimate of the time frame. The first 2 hours of staff time per request carry no fee; after that, the charge may not exceed $25 per hour. A black and white copy of the standard 8 1/2 by 11 inch page costs no more than 10 cents per page. Payment in advance may be required when the estimated total cost exceeds $100, and a denial is subject to appeal as provided in section 409. Each figure can be quoted against its subsection, the whole advantage of the published state; the folio on fees and advance payment rests on the same text.
One month, seventeen days, two years
The Maine Human Rights Commission publishes its procedure with dates attached, on pages read on September 6, 2026. Once a complaint is filed, the respondent receives the complaint along with a Request for Information and Documents, and generally has one month to respond. An investigator is assigned, notifies both parties how the investigation will proceed, and writes a report containing a summary of the facts given by both sides and a recommendation as to whether there are or are not reasonable grounds to believe that unlawful discrimination occurred. Either party then has a seventeen day period in which to make a written submission of disagreement, and the Commissioners review the report, hear oral argument, and vote at a scheduled Commission Meeting which is open to the public. The published figures sit side by side:
| Where | Published figure | What it times |
|---|---|---|
| Records request | 5 working days | Time to acknowledge receipt |
| Discrimination complaint | one month, generally | Respondent's answer time |
| Objection to a report | 17 days | Window for a written submission of disagreement |
| Right to sue | 180 days or more | Time after filing |
| Entire Commission process | two years | Outside limit after filing |
| Court action | 2 years or 90 days, whichever is greater | From the act, or from a dismissal, right-to-sue letter or failed conciliation |
Two silences sit beside that calendar. The pages read on that date publish neither the filing deadline for bringing a complaint to the Commission, nor any explicit list of what the Commission cannot do. The report is described by its contents and its destination; nothing on the pages read says whether a copy is public.
Why does discipline carry a name?
The Board of Overseers of the Bar, created by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in 1978 to govern the conduct of lawyers as officers of the Court, publishes in the opposite direction. Its site, read on September 6, 2026, carries an attorney directory, disciplinary decisions organized by date with the respondent's name on each, issued orders and dispositions, and a hearing schedule giving dates, times and respondent names. Where the Commission publishes a procedure and leaves the papers with the parties, the Board publishes outcomes under the name of the person decided about, and the path by which discipline becomes public runs through exactly those pages. The site distinguishes grievance complaints from fee disputes, operates a Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection, and publishes no explicit statement of what it cannot do.
The silence is a fact too
What follows from the difference is a habit of reading, not a key. A published figure carries its source and its date, so it can be quoted and argued with; an unpublished one can only be guessed at, and guessing is how readers come to believe a page said a thing it never said. The silence of an official page is verifiable: any reader can open it, search it, and confirm that the missing rule or deadline is not there under another heading.
The Judicial Branch's own site offers one step. The courts page carries a Find a Court feature; a reader can use it to move from the general descriptions to a single court's pages, then see which figures that court publishes and which questions its pages leave standing. The record ends where the page ends, and everything past that edge has to be asked for by name.